Both games are in an extremely early design stage.Â The War of the Ring game is a little further along â€“ Iâ€™ve tested out a combat mechanic, and it works pretty well.Â The combat is card-based, with each player amassing, through the â€œrecruitmentâ€ mechanics (which are TBD) cards representing individual units; you shuffle your cards together and then flip them one at a time, War-style, evaluating each time which card is the stronger.Â Thereâ€™s more to it than this, and Iâ€™ll dedicate a post to describing the combat mechanic in detail.Â But basically, the game involves traveling around the board rallying armies to your cause, then throwing them against the opposing sidesâ€™ armies to (a) buy time for the Quest to succeed (if youâ€™re Gandalf or Aragorn or Denethor/Boromir), or (b) emerge as the replacement Dark Lord of Middle Earth (if youâ€™re Saruman), or (c) stamp out all happiness in Middle Earth (if youâ€™re Sauron).
The quest game is even rougher, but the core idea Iâ€™ve had from the beginning involves the search mechanic.Â I think it will be something like Scotland Yard or Fury of Dracula, where Frodo moves in secret and the Nazgul player moves his ringwraiths around to try to force Frodo to put on the ring and reveal his whereabouts (at which point they can try to attack and capture him).Â Frodo has a (hidden?) track that reflects his â€œring resistanceâ€, and the Nazgul player positions his ringwraiths; then Frodo adds their â€œpullâ€ â€“ 1 point for each ringwraith in a space adjacent to his current location, and 2 points for each ringwraith in the same space as Frodo â€“ if this exceeds Frodoâ€™s ring resistance, then Frodo puts on the ring and reveals his current position to the Nazgul player.Â After that, they can potentially have a battle, possibly using the same card-based resolution that the other game will use.
This sounds ok enough, but the wild card thrown into the game is that a third player plays Gollum; he knows at all times where Frodo is, but must bide his time before striking and trying to recover the ring. Â Because of his ability to find Frodo, he may be a useful quarry for the Nazgul player, but because he knows the secret paths that lead through enemy strongholds, he can also be a valuable ally, if a dangerous one, for Frodo. Â What I donâ€™t know is whether the Gollum player can also become â€œSmeagolâ€, and, through the kindness of Frodo, become united to the Quest, as Gollum apparently did in the books, at least for a time. Â I could envision the Frodo playing â€œFrodoâ€ cards that are weaker but help Gollum/Smeagol, or â€œSamâ€ cards, that are more powerful but that harm Gollum/Smeagol, pushing him to â€œthe dark sideâ€. Â But I donâ€™t know if the idea of a playerâ€™s victory condition changing mid-way through the game, would be too frustrating for that player, particularly if it can bifurcate back and forth (unless the player himself has some control over which way heâ€™s going to go).
Needless to say, thereâ€™s lots of work to be done on both games, and throughout, there need to be interface points whereby the two games can interact with each other and even some room for some players to switch from one table to the other. Â Some of these ideas are easy to conceive â€“ for example, maybe the Sauron player determines how many Ringwraiths heâ€™ll provide to the Nazgul player for use in the quest and how many heâ€™ll keep for himself for their benefits as leaders of his armies. Â Maybe Gandalf can hop between boards, alternately helping the Quest or the armies. Â This isnâ€™t actually the hard part â€“ the hard part is having simple and clean mechanics in place for when the games are played in standalone mode, so that the game itself can handle this kind of thing. Â So, even if there isnâ€™t a â€œWar of the Ringâ€ game going on at the other table, the Nazgul player still needs to have some variability to his ringwraith quantity each turn, and Frodo needs to sometimes have access to Gandalf and sometimes not.